+1
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Charl van Niekerk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 12:02 -0800, Jeff Lindsay wrote: >> Yes, this is where I'm at, too. It seems like we're getting there >> though. It just seems like (and I could be wrong!) there is a lot of >> bias towards Atom/feed semantics. Even the tiniest structure is a >> constraint to use cases and adoption. That's all I'm saying. Also just >> the marketing. Is it about feeds or is it a distribution framework? >> Because it sounds like the former and that's what people think that I >> talk to and they decide it's not worth messing with. > > Same here, Atom feeds were obviously the most logical place to start and > would have the greatest short-term impact on the web as it stands but to > have to reinvent the wheel for other formats is kinda ridiculous. Would > be awesome to see PubSubHubbub become a more generic distribution > framework and be marketed as such! > >
