Monica, thanks for the comments. For the verification of the access token, I believe the subscriber will do that against the hub, right? Isn't this an unecessary burden to add to the hubs if we can find a way to sign the message altegether and avoid one more HTTP request? Jeff proposed this : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-burke-content-signature-00 what's your thought on this? Julien
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Julien Genestoux < [email protected]> wrote: > Please guys... this is really not the place. I think Matt's concerned are > interesting and need to be addressed. It doesn't matter that Matt or anyone > else asks the question. Let's just forget about names. > > Julien > > > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Matthew Terenzio <[email protected]>wrote: > >> speaking abou tBadera not Julien >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Matthew Terenzio <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> you have serious issues dude. go get help >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Terenzio >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought it was hugely relevant. Sorry. You see, I can't seem to win >>>>> here. I'll go back to keeping my mouth shut. >>>> >>>> >>>> echo, echo, echo ... everywhere one goes, mterenzio is an oppressed >>>> victim ... >>>> >>> >>> >> >
