I know them pretty well. This isn't an established protocol, but they're trying to get it out there. I think they share a lot of the same feelings about pubsubhubbub as I do.
-jeff On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Julien Genestoux < [email protected]> wrote: > Indeed, it would be amazing to see why PubSubhubbub couldn't fit their > needs. > A little bit worrysome to me :"© Copyright 2011 by Sam Curren and Phillip > J. Windley." on a protocol :) > > Julien > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> See: http://www.eventedapi.org/spec >> >> As we consider what can be done to move PubSubHubbub forward, it might >> make sense to take a look at some other protocols that folk have defined to >> determine if there is anything in them that PubSubHubbub should be >> implemented or if they do things better that PSHB does. The folk at Kynetx ( >> http://apps.kynetx.com/) have been building up a PSHB-like system for >> some time now... I'm not sure I understand why PSHB wouldn't, in fact, >> serve their needs. >> >> bob wyman >> >> >> > -- Jeff Lindsay http://progrium.com
