For those who do not feel like reading the spec and comparing each of its points, here is a summary of the changes, and why we think they're good!
Thanks On Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:02:12 PM UTC+2, Julien wrote: > > All, > > I hope you're doing well. > For the past couple months, me and several other people tried to identify > how we could make PubSubHubbub better, by fixing some of its issues, > but also opening the door to more use cases (private resources... etc). > It is based on a lot of experience that we have accumulated by hosting > some of the biggest hubs out there, but also conversations we've had > with publishers who sometimes didn't go down the PubSubHubbub way. > > We came to the conclusion that there was no way we could make 0.4 > downward compatible because 0.3 makes too many assumption on the > types of resources (Atom or RSS feeds). > > Here is a project of how the spec could evolve. We have already got > a lot of feedback from people who implemented the previous spec > but also from people who want to implement it now that it solves some > of the issues. > > Git repo (feel free to check out): > https://github.com/pubsubhubbub/PubSubHubbub/tree/future > > Human readable version at: > https://superfeedr-misc.s3.amazonaws.com/pubsubhubbub-core-0.4.html > > I would personally appreciate your constructive feedback. > > Thanks, > > Julien > >
