I think Julien meant to include a link to here<http://blog.superfeedr.com/pubsubhubbub-0-4/> . -Andy
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 4:52:13 AM UTC-4, Julien wrote: > > For those who do not feel like reading the spec and comparing each of its > points, here is a summary of the changes, and why > we think they're good! > > Thanks > > > > > On Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:02:12 PM UTC+2, Julien wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I hope you're doing well. >> For the past couple months, me and several other people tried to identify >> how we could make PubSubHubbub better, by fixing some of its issues, >> but also opening the door to more use cases (private resources... etc). >> It is based on a lot of experience that we have accumulated by hosting >> some of the biggest hubs out there, but also conversations we've had >> with publishers who sometimes didn't go down the PubSubHubbub way. >> >> We came to the conclusion that there was no way we could make 0.4 >> downward compatible because 0.3 makes too many assumption on the >> types of resources (Atom or RSS feeds). >> >> Here is a project of how the spec could evolve. We have already got >> a lot of feedback from people who implemented the previous spec >> but also from people who want to implement it now that it solves some >> of the issues. >> >> Git repo (feel free to check out): >> https://github.com/pubsubhubbub/PubSubHubbub/tree/future >> >> Human readable version at: >> https://superfeedr-misc.s3.amazonaws.com/pubsubhubbub-core-0.4.html >> >> I would personally appreciate your constructive feedback. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Julien >> >>
