Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Marc Rintsch wrote:
...
This one is critical.

It should be clarified, thus the templates can be corrected.

It affects kid, too.

kid is an XML templating tool so I expect it to produce XML with the XML tag. Why break/cripple a valid XML document just because Dreamweaver can't cope with it!?

Personally I've broken/crippled it to be able to design visually.

It's Dreamweaver that needs to be fixed here.  IMHO.

I don't think so.

with a possibility of 99,9%, kid or pudge does something wrong.

pudge problem: the DOCTYPE tag is missing within the templates.

But I don't know what.

What defines a valid XML document?

is there any requirement to the filename extension?

pudge/kid templates are xhtml documents, thus they must contain the DOCTYPE:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#strict

.

--
http://lazaridis.com

_______________________________________________
Pudge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lesscode.org/mailman/listinfo/pudge

Reply via email to