Thanks for explanation. That all sounds correct. Here are some related thoughts regarding our docs builders. I'd like some feedback on these ideas.
I think we should delete all docs builders for 2.10- including the -build, -release, and -dev builders. We don't use them anymore and the docs will continue to be served without disruption. Should we rename the builders ending in '-build' builders to be '-beta-or-rc'? Or maybe '-testing'? Also your PR is going to fix the two failing docs builders right? I can review that if that is helpful. I'm hoping to see all the docs builders go green. Thank you! Brian On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Tanya Tereshchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > I expected '.beta' or '.rc' to be present in the 'version' in config [0] > but according to the docs [1], this is not the case because 2.11 is > released. > I was not aware of that policy, so everything is correct :) > > But when there will be Beta or RC version, expect docs to be published at > http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/<pulp_version>/testing/ > <http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/> > [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/ > config/releases/2.11-build.yaml#L10 > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/ > config/releases/README.md#xy-buildyaml > > Tanya > > > On 12/19/2016 11:07 AM, Tanya Tereshchenko wrote: > > We have jobs for dev and release branches and this *-build ones are for > the rest which is basically Beta and RC builds and they are triggered > manually when needed. That's my understanding. > > I expect them to be published under 'testing/', so for 2.11-build they > should be here: http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/ > because of the way path is constructed [0] [1]. > > I am looking at configs now and they do not seem to be correct to me. I'll > make a PR to see if others agree. > > [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs- > builder.py#L75-L78 > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs- > builder.py#L170 > > Tanya > > On 12/17/2016 08:26 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > > These two Jenkins jobs are currently failing and I am not sure where they are > supposed to publish docs to. Can someone explain what the purpose of these > jobs is? I'd like to fix them. > > -Dennis > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing > [email protected]https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing > [email protected]https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
