Thanks for clarifying, I hadn't noticed the "handlers" portion of the path.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Bernhard Suttner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mihai, > > the change is on the client side to use zypper instead of yum to install / > uninstall / update packages and package groups. Zypper is the package > manager on SUSE based linux distribution (pretty good as it is written in > C++ and therefore really fast) > > I guess, you are also planning to integrate dnf and use it instead of yum. > Therefore, I think you will need to have a plugin structure to decide, > which package manager to use on the various systems. > > Best regards, > Bernhard > > ------------------------------ > *Von: *"Mihai Ibanescu" <[email protected]> > *An: *"suttner" <[email protected]> > *CC: *"Pulp-dev" <[email protected]> > *Gesendet: *Montag, 27. März 2017 14:56:00 > *Betreff: *Re: [Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request) > > Bernhard, > It may have been clear for others, but I need to clarify this for myself. > > Is the intention of the patch to allow pulp to run on a SuSE system? > > Or is it to make Pulp repositories that are properly understood by zypper? > > The title of the PR seems to imply the latter, while the patch seems to > implement the former. > > Thank you! > Mihai > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Bernhard Suttner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> .... just spend some minutes and fixed the issues found by flake8. See >> pull request: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1041 >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *Von: *"Bernhard Suttner" <[email protected]> >> *An: *[email protected] >> *Gesendet: *Sonntag, 26. März 2017 16:29:13 >> *Betreff: *[Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request) >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I have send a pull request to pulp_rpm regarding using zypper instead of >> yum on SUSE based distributions. I know, that some (OK, a lot) of tests >> failed. >> >> Would you merge this change if I would fix the issue? Just want to make >> sure, if there is anything else I should consider. Maybe there are other >> integrations planned like dnf and you want to re-structure the code in this >> part - e.g. with a configurable plugin structure. >> >> Best regards, >> Bernhard >> >> ATIX Informationstechnologie und Consulting AG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
