+1

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:45 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> David
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Alley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Dennis Kliban <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We had some discussion about this PUP in a separate thread[0]. We have
>>> now reached consensus on the wording of the PUP to open it up to voting.
>>>
>>> To refresh everyone’s memory, voting is outlined in PUP-1:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#voting
>>>
>>> And here’s the PUP in question:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/dkliban/pups/blob/pup4/pup-0004.md
>>>
>>> Please respond to this thread with your vote or any comments/questions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [0] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2017-November/msg00110.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to