+1 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Bihan Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:45 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> David >> >> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Alley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We had some discussion about this PUP in a separate thread[0]. We have >>>> now reached consensus on the wording of the PUP to open it up to voting. >>>> >>>> To refresh everyone’s memory, voting is outlined in PUP-1: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#voting >>>> >>>> And here’s the PUP in question: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/dkliban/pups/blob/pup4/pup-0004.md >>>> >>>> Please respond to this thread with your vote or any comments/questions. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [0] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2017-November/msg00 >>>> 110.html >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
