Cool. If we go down this path, would this plan make sense? 1. Create an installer project in redmine 2. Move over all issues (opened and closed) to this project that are tagged "Pulp 3 installer" 3. Remove the "Pulp 3 installer" tag
David On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabricio Aguiar <fabricio.agu...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 for creating a new project, > Installer query: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=154 > > Best regards, > Fabricio Aguiar > Software Engineer, Pulp Project > Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/> > +55 11 999652368 > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:48 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the >> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues. >> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer >> team triage them. >> >> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My >> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has >> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of >> pulpcore. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a >> consensus by then. >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
