Yes, it makes sense Best regards, Fabricio Aguiar Software Engineer, Pulp Project Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/> +55 11 999652368
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:24 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Cool. If we go down this path, would this plan make sense? > > 1. Create an installer project in redmine > 2. Move over all issues (opened and closed) to this project that are > tagged "Pulp 3 installer" > 3. Remove the "Pulp 3 installer" tag > > David > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabricio Aguiar < > fabricio.agu...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 for creating a new project, >> Installer query: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=154 >> >> Best regards, >> Fabricio Aguiar >> Software Engineer, Pulp Project >> Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/> >> +55 11 999652368 >> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:48 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the >>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues. >>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer >>> team triage them. >>> >>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My >>> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has >>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of >>> pulpcore. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a >>> consensus by then. >>> >>> David >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
