On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:27 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I looked a little bit more into Gitlab CI this morning. If my > understanding is correct, their cap is 50,000 minutes. Right now, we're > using about 44,000 minutes in Travis[0]. Some of our jobs (eg > pulp_installer, pulp-cli, etc) are on GHA already so in theory if we moved > everything over to Gitlab CI, we could potentially hit their cap? > This is my main concern. If we're going to spend the effort to switch, we need to not end up in the same situation. > [0] https://travis-ci.com/github/pulp?tab=insights > > David > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:18 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> We looked at Fedora's Zuul instance before and decided against using it >> for two reasons: (A) it'd be a lot of work/maintaince (eg we'd have to >> write our own zuul jobs, bring our own compute resource, etc), and (B) we >> were worried about the support since it's not a paid (or freemium) option. >> >> That said, it might be worth considering again if nothing else for >> testing on specific environments such as selinux which is difficult to do >> on hosted CI providers. >> >> David >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:51 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:35 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Travis recently announced changes to their plan pricing that will >>> impact open-source projects such as Pulp[0]. It's likely that we'll exhaust >>> the monthly budget that Travis is going to give OSS projects and we're not >>> sure how generous Travis will be giving out extra build minutes. >>> > >>> > Given our concern, members of the CI team met today to discuss our >>> options. We have some notes[1] from our meeting about some of the options >>> that stood out to us. We'd like to have a plan in place when the new >>> pricing gets rolled out to our organization. >>> > >>> > Any feedback is welcome. >>> > >>> > [0] https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing >>> > [1] https://hackmd.io/n6kStnNiTPGekAWGdNvbhA >>> >>> Could we use the Fedora CI Zuul instance[2]? There's already a ton of >>> other projects using one of the Zuul instances on >>> softwarefactory-project.io, and leveraging the Fedora CI >>> infrastructure could also help future efforts in doing auto-release to >>> Fedora for Pulp releases, too. >>> >>> [2]: https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/projects >>> >>> -- >>> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
