Mike McCune wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi folks,
So Pulp has been on a hiatus for a while and I think it's about time
we tried to revive the effort. To move forward, it's probably best to
start small and simple with a limited scope. We put together a list
of command line arguments that a simple command-line client that
creates, mirrors, and removes repos (as well as add / remove / list
packages in said repos):
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/DevelopmentPlan
I asked around in #rhel and #pulp on freenode today for feedback and
initial feedback on these commands was positive. Do you have any
ideas or feedback on them - do you see any issues?
Also I put together a list of broad requirements that are more like a
long-term roadmap. Right now the command line outline above should
fulfill the first three on this list. Let me know what you think:
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/Requirements
Do you have a nose-bleed level postioning for this project? I am
trying to categorize it relative to
cobbler
pungi
spacewalk
jboss-dna
rhq
Even if it is a one liner such as
component of
competitor of
similar, but.....
no relation
That would be helpful
-- bk
a new component for Spacewalk (but can be used without Spacewalk) to
simplify and streamline the content synchronization process.
How does that sound?
Sounds good with the exception of cobbler.. since cobbler seems to
doalot of the same voodoo around repo management. Especially since I
assumed that there would be some cobbler <- Spacewalk integration.
I am asking because for the thincrust tooling we would like an appliance
build environment which needs this fucntionality but would also benefit
from the provisioning provided by cobbler. I am curious where the repo
logic is, or if it will be extracted out to a higher level piece.
-- bk
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
