Matthew Barr wrote:
a new component for Spacewalk (but can be used without Spacewalk) to
simplify and streamline the content synchronization process.
How does that sound?
Sounds good with the exception of cobbler.. since cobbler seems to
doalot of the same voodoo around repo management. Especially since I
assumed that there would be some cobbler <- Spacewalk integration.
I am asking because for the thincrust tooling we would like an
appliance build environment which needs this fucntionality but would
also benefit from the provisioning provided by cobbler. I am curious
where the repo logic is, or if it will be extracted out to a higher
level piece.
Hmm.. I'd love to see it as an option in Cobbler, too. Let you select
repos for installation (like the current wget) vs repo lines in the
kickstart.
This functionality could be used by cobbler to deal w/ repos, especially
ones that aren't mirrored. I haven't really thought about mirrored
ones, but that would probably be helped, too.
This is where my confusion is:
https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/wiki/UsingCobblerImport
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/
Looks like similar repo management facilities. They diverge somewhat
after that. Is there a base library for the repo management?
-- bk
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
