The POC for Crane looks good to me. Story 3761 seems to be all about making a new rsync distributor for Docker. Do you still see that as necessary?
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Simon Baatz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:39AM -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Simon Baatz <[1][email protected]> > > wrote: > ... > > Is there a way to enable protection for both the redirections and > > content? (I know that crane 3.2.0 supports Akamai CDN tokens, but > > that does not help with a local server.) > > > > There is not a way to add content protection for the content itself > > right now. > > We prepared proof-of-concept code to deliver content from Crane/httpd > directly without redirecting. This allows to use basic > authentication for all content. > > Commit is at [0] ("/v2" API endpoint only, no "X-Sendfile" support > yet). This turned out to be pretty simple. Any feedback > is welcome, of course. > > > [0]: https://github.com/Telekom-PD/crane/commit/ > 7b065b1dd96281e31c96de61a03b3293b5c2bd89 >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
