Actually, let's move this discussion to the issue tracker[0].
[0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3761#note-2 On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > The POC for Crane looks good to me. > > Story 3761 seems to be all about making a new rsync distributor for > Docker. Do you still see that as necessary? > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Simon Baatz <gmbno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:39AM -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Simon Baatz <[1]gmbno...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> ... >> > Is there a way to enable protection for both the redirections and >> > content? (I know that crane 3.2.0 supports Akamai CDN tokens, but >> > that does not help with a local server.) >> > >> > There is not a way to add content protection for the content itself >> > right now. >> >> We prepared proof-of-concept code to deliver content from Crane/httpd >> directly without redirecting. This allows to use basic >> authentication for all content. >> >> Commit is at [0] ("/v2" API endpoint only, no "X-Sendfile" support >> yet). This turned out to be pretty simple. Any feedback >> is welcome, of course. >> >> >> [0]: https://github.com/Telekom-PD/crane/commit/7b065b1dd96281e31 >> c96de61a03b3293b5c2bd89 >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list