This is not an intended change. Please file a bug at https://pulp.plan.io/issues/new/ and we will try to address it as soon as possible.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:31 AM Sebastian Skracic <sskra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Howdi all! > > I have just upgraded the backend to pulpcore-3.6.0 and > pulp-rpm-3.6.0, and then bumped the corresponding Python bindings to > pulpcore-client==3.6.0 and pulp-rpm-client==3.6.0. > > To my surprise, I've discovered that 'reserved_resources_record' > for tasks is no longer present in the bindings, and is omitted from the > OpenAPI specs, cf: https://pulp3.skracic.net/pulp/api/v3/docs/api.json > (search for TaskResponse) > > What's puzzling me is that the field is still present in the REST > responses, so it's technically possible to fetch it using > pulpcore-client==3.5.0 bindings. > > Is this an intended change or maybe a glitch in OpenAPI generation > process? > > Thanks, > > -- > Sebastian Skracic - Red Hat - sskra...@redhat.com > GPG: 9D5B 2B87 908E 85B6 5D1E 3527 76B7 6594 08A5 A206 > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list