On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:52:49AM -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote: > This is not an intended change. Please file a bug at > https://pulp.plan.io/issues/new/ and we will try to address it as soon as > possible.
Roger that -- https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7347 > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:31 AM Sebastian Skracic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Howdi all! > > > > I have just upgraded the backend to pulpcore-3.6.0 and > > pulp-rpm-3.6.0, and then bumped the corresponding Python bindings to > > pulpcore-client==3.6.0 and pulp-rpm-client==3.6.0. > > > > To my surprise, I've discovered that 'reserved_resources_record' > > for tasks is no longer present in the bindings, and is omitted from the > > OpenAPI specs, cf: https://pulp3.skracic.net/pulp/api/v3/docs/api.json > > (search for TaskResponse) > > > > What's puzzling me is that the field is still present in the REST > > responses, so it's technically possible to fetch it using > > pulpcore-client==3.5.0 bindings. > > > > Is this an intended change or maybe a glitch in OpenAPI generation > > process? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Sebastian Skracic - Red Hat - [email protected] > > GPG: 9D5B 2B87 908E 85B6 5D1E 3527 76B7 6594 08A5 A206 > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list -- Sebastian Skracic - Red Hat - [email protected] GPG: 9D5B 2B87 908E 85B6 5D1E 3527 76B7 6594 08A5 A206
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
