https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90210
--- Comment #29 from Tanu Kaskinen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Brady from comment #28) > (In reply to Alessandro Ferri from comment #27) > > > Thanks for these. No promises, at least for a couple of weeks... > > > > Thanks again. I wait with impatience. If I can help you in some way, just > > say the word. > > Hi again. I spent a little time on this yesterday. It turns out that the > pulseaudio back end uses the 'simple' pulseaudio interface. The problem with > it is that the latency information it returns in the simple interface is > very inaccurate. I suppose you're using pa_simple_get_latency()? Yes, that's somehow broken (bug 81075). It's very sad that such basic functionality doesn't work... Unfortunately, I can't commit to fixing it any time soon, and I doubt anyone else will either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
