https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90210
--- Comment #31 from Alessandro Ferri <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Brady from comment #28) > (In reply to Alessandro Ferri from comment #27) > > > Thanks for these. No promises, at least for a couple of weeks... > > > > Thanks again. I wait with impatience. If I can help you in some way, just > > say the word. > > Hi again. I spent a little time on this yesterday. It turns out that the > pulseaudio back end uses the 'simple' pulseaudio interface. The problem with > it is that the latency information it returns in the simple interface is > very inaccurate. Shairport Sync monitors the latency every time it adds a > packet of audio frame – i.e. about every 8 ms. Unfortunately, it seems that > the latency information is completely unreliable at this level of > interaction. > > So, getting a good quality pulseaudio system will essentially require a > complete rewrite of the backend to avoid using the 'simple' interface. It > might take some time ;) Hi again Mike, I saw that came out of the Relise 2.3.x and that you are editing many aspects of shairport sync. There is hope that you review latency and sync with pulseaudio? I also need to ask for clarification on file shairport-sync.conf. Where can I send the request? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
