2011/6/22 Colin Guthrie <[email protected]>:
> 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 22/06/11 15:52 did gyre and gimble:
>> Is this OK to do on the road to 1.0, or do we want to keep the
>> description argument indefinitely?
>
> What are people's opinions? I'm happy for this to happen now. May as
> well cut down on this kind of stuff.

On a related note: what about libpulse-browse? There are a couple of
warnings at compile-time that it is being phased out. Can it be
removed or disabled by default at least? If that was the original
plan, it seems good to do it pre-1.0.

Maarten

> Arun, Tanu... WDYT?
>
> Col
>
> --
>
> Colin Guthrie
> gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
> http://colin.guthr.ie/
>
> Day Job:
>  Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
> Open Source:
>  Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/]
>  PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
>  Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
>
> _______________________________________________
> pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to