On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 15:13 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > How about just setting it to 0 when doing the return? Does that no avoid > the need for the 2nd patch or does this just confuse the semantics of > the whole thing?
I think setting *usec_to_next to 0 would be fine. -- Tanu _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
