On 2011-10-28 10:08, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
2011/10/27 David Henningsson<[email protected]>:
Expose the new stuff through pacmd.
Can you also make it available in the pactl output?
That would make sense, I assume. Let's do that once these patches are
merged.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson<[email protected]>
---
src/pulsecore/cli-text.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/cli-text.c b/src/pulsecore/cli-text.c
index 5498744..2253635 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/cli-text.c
+++ b/src/pulsecore/cli-text.c
@@ -102,6 +102,33 @@ char *pa_client_list_to_string(pa_core *c) {
return pa_strbuf_tostring_free(s);
}
+static const char *port_available_to_string(pa_port_available_t a) {
+ switch (a) {
+ case PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN:
+ return "unknown";
+ case PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_NO:
+ return "no";
+ case PA_PORT_AVAILABLE_YES:
+ return "yes";
+ default:
+ return "invalid"; /* Should never happen! */
In general we use pa_assert_not_reached(). If that's applicable here
too, then the comment is not necessary anymore.
I don't mind changing this. IIRC, I just tried to follow the convention
around me.
--
David Henningsson
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
