Hi David, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, David Henningsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Nowadays, we are using more hashmaps and other things, than we did > before. Therefore, I often get the "flist is full (don't worry)" > message. This change should avoid that message. I was unable to find > any significance in increase of memory footprint from this change.
I'm unsure whether this is the right solution to the problem. >From my understanding, the flist is used to store pointer to to-be-freed memory in order to reuse it later instead of calling pairs of xfree/xmalloc. Increasing the flist size would allow you to store more pointers and not free them, this is useless. However, you should really worry about why a specific flist is full since this means more than 128 pointer of the same type have been freed in a row without a single allocation. Regards, Frédéric _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
