On 07/02/2012 09:26 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:45:42 +0200, David Henningsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
It might make sense to keep something like
#ifndef HAVE_STD_BOOL
typedef int bool;
I sincerely don't recommend that kind of hacks.
int and bool are completely different things. The representation in memory
may be different depending on the ABI. Furthermore, the conversion rule for
the compiler are not the same. That can introduce subtle bugs on old
compilers. I think it's best to fail explicitly than to hide bugs.
bool / pa_bool_t is not used in the public API/ABI, there we use only
ints (for the reasons you claim above, I believe).
Does your point still stand even if it is only used internally?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
