On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 16:15 +0300, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Tanu, > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:00 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > >> From: Mikel Astiz <[email protected]> > >> > >> This simplifies the code a lot, in favour of the D-Bus Media interface > >> in BlueZ. There might still be some functionality missing, such as the > >> bitpool adjusting. > > > > So the BlueZ D-Bus interface still doesn't have all features of the > > socket interface? Or do the features exist, but Pulseaudio doesn't yet > > use them? What exactly is missing? It doesn't seem very sensible to drop > > the support for the old system if the new system doesn't have all > > features of the old system, unless the missing features are useless. > > It seems like he removed the logic to reduce the bitpool if the audio > start skipping, but I don't see any reason to do that as it doesn't > depend on IPC to do that.
If that's the only problem, then great. Any volunteers for updating the patch (this time without removing the bitpool logic)? -- Tanu _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
