On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 13:58 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote: > From: Mikel Astiz <[email protected]> > > These patches are *NOT* intended to be merged.
BlueZ 5 has been released, is this notice still valid? > I submit them as work-in-progress, mainly to be able to test BlueZ and > oFono during the 5.0 release development. > > The proposed approach is that bluetooth-util detects the version of > BlueZ during runtime. Therefore, the modules should not see any > difference. > > There's been some discussion whether an independent BlueZ-5-ready > version of bluetooth-util should be started. My take on this is that > the APIs are similar enough to keep one single bluetooth-util. > > The code gets a bit more ugly, but the alternative of splitting would > introduce duplicated code and thus more maintenance work. So my > proposal is: keep it merged while it's possible. I agree with that. There would probably need to be some infrastructure for having multiple separate "bluetooth backend" implementations, and that infrastructure would become redundant once we drop the bluez 4 support (unless we have support for the new android bluetooth stack by then...) -- Tanu _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
