On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, I've held the opinion for quite some time now that sinks/sources
should be merged with ports. It's a big change and doesn't bring any new
features in itself, so I don't consider it as a high-priority thing, but
patches are welcome.
Is there any ongoing effort to move this forward? Is there a consensus
about the 1:1 mapping between ports and sink/sources?
No, and no.
We decided Immediately before 3.0 that some Bluetooth ports should be
merged (commit 40329acc1a28145643e49207e9d65cd05bbda2c8) but this is
basically UI-oriented and not very convenient for internal use, as
already discussed.
In this case, I was tracking down a issue we have in
module-bluetooth-device, and the solution would be much simpler if we
had independent ports.
So; if port are merged with sinks/sources, I assume you would like this
merged object to be once per stream (i e different for a2dp and
hfp/hsp), which would again break the UI?
This looks like a problem with the approach of trying to merge ports and
sinks/sources.
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
