On 03/07/2013 11:32 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
From: Mikel Astiz <[email protected]>
Same as v2 but with the changes suggested by David in patch 3/4.
I've now tested and pushed the three first patches, and also an extra:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/commit/?id=135afa28e7d4f34aec776fe4d225e21b76fc461c
Thank you for your contribution!
As discussed in IRC, I would suggest patch 4/4 is not merged yet, even if we
agreed on it, to avoid adding and removing features back and forth from the
core.
From original cover-letter:
This patchset considers the device's form factor (Bluetooth device class) in
order to decide the name and description of the ports.
The approach assumes the form factor of a paired device will remain constant,
which seems to be the case in any real-life scenario.
Patch 4/4 simplifies the core by removing dynamic port creation, recently added
due to Bluetooth's interests. However, now that we have a slightly different
interpretation of ports, this core extension should be reconsidered.
Mikel Astiz (4):
bluetooth: Use enum to represent form factors
bluetooth: Add specific form factor for phones
bluetooth: Use form factor to set port name and description
Revert "card: Support adding ports dynamically"
src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c | 78 +++++++++++++++------
src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h | 16 ++++-
src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
src/modules/module-card-restore.c | 43 ------------
src/pulsecore/card.c | 19 -----
src/pulsecore/card.h | 1 -
src/pulsecore/core.h | 1 -
7 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss