On 03/07/2013 11:32 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
From: Mikel Astiz <[email protected]>

Same as v2 but with the changes suggested by David in patch 3/4.

I've now tested and pushed the three first patches, and also an extra:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/commit/?id=135afa28e7d4f34aec776fe4d225e21b76fc461c

Thank you for your contribution!


As discussed in IRC, I would suggest patch 4/4 is not merged yet, even if we 
agreed on it, to avoid adding and removing features back and forth from the 
core.

 From original cover-letter:

This patchset considers the device's form factor (Bluetooth device class) in 
order to decide the name and description of the ports.

The approach assumes the form factor of a paired device will remain constant, 
which seems to be the case in any real-life scenario.

Patch 4/4 simplifies the core by removing dynamic port creation, recently added 
due to Bluetooth's interests. However, now that we have a slightly different 
interpretation of ports, this core extension should be reconsidered.

Mikel Astiz (4):
   bluetooth: Use enum to represent form factors
   bluetooth: Add specific form factor for phones
   bluetooth: Use form factor to set port name and description
   Revert "card: Support adding ports dynamically"

  src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c          | 78 +++++++++++++++------
  src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h          | 16 ++++-
  src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
  src/modules/module-card-restore.c               | 43 ------------
  src/pulsecore/card.c                            | 19 -----
  src/pulsecore/card.h                            |  1 -
  src/pulsecore/core.h                            |  1 -
  7 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)




--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to