On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 04:28 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone shed some light on the best case and typical latency that > Pulse provides for standard operations?
What do you mean by standard operations? I'd estimate volume changes etc. normally (on an ALSA sink) have a few millisecond latency (best case 0.5 ms audio buffer + scheduling latency). > Also how that is affected by using jack-sink assuming jack is set to the > lowest possible latency that a device can handle? When jackd asks for N frames from PulseAudio, pulseaudio will render N frames. There's no extra buffering done in the Jack sink, so volume changes etc. will have latency that is roughly the same as the normal Jack client latency. If by "standard operations" you meant the stream latency that PulseAudio clients see (in which case "standard operations" is a strange way to say it, IMO), then that depends on what the clients request. If they let PulseAudio choose, the latency is typically 2 seconds. If they want minimal latency, with infinite CPU power I think the lower bound is maybe a couple of milliseconds, but since computers don't have infinite CPU power, the practical limit is some tens of milliseconds based on what I've heard (the exact limit naturally depends on how beefy the CPU is). -- Tanu _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
