30.05.2014 18:01, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 14:30 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
28.05.2014 12:08, Jay Sorg wrote:
I don't want a TCP or UDP connection for each session or a confusing
sink or source name.
module-esound-sink works with unix-domain sockets, too, and allows
overriding the sink name. The problem is that there is no
module-esound-source, but it is solvable in theory (although I am not
sure if module-esound-source would be accepted if one submits it).
Don't worry about the acceptability of module-esound-source. If we need
a source for xrdp anyway, it doesn't matter if its implemented by using
the esound protocol or some custom xrdp protocol. Or is there some
reason why module-esound-source would be somehow significantly more evil
than module-esound-sink?
There is no such reason against module-esound-source.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
