Thanks for the patch. Overall I think this is good new functionality.

Here's a review, which is mostly about details:

On 2014-04-15 02:14, Lukasz Marek wrote:

 From ab9e95ab62602ed107b5d46642149de7ead15c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukasz Marek<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 02:08:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add pa_stream_write_ext_free() function.

Missing prefix, maybe "Client API:" would be good here, so the subject becomes:
"Client API: Add Add pa_stream_write_ext_free function"


New function allows to pass data pointer that is a member
of the outer structure that need to be freed too when data
is not needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Marek<[email protected]>
---
  src/map-file             |  1 +
  src/pulse/stream.c       | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
  src/pulse/stream.h       | 11 +++++++++++
  src/pulsecore/memblock.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
  src/pulsecore/memblock.h |  2 +-
  5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/map-file b/src/map-file
index dc36fdc..5159829 100644
--- a/src/map-file
+++ b/src/map-file
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ pa_stream_update_sample_rate;
  pa_stream_update_timing_info;
  pa_stream_writable_size;
  pa_stream_write;
+pa_stream_write_ext_free;
  pa_strerror;
  pa_sw_cvolume_divide;
  pa_sw_cvolume_divide_scalar;
diff --git a/src/pulse/stream.c b/src/pulse/stream.c
index 8e35c29..2c9a777 100644
--- a/src/pulse/stream.c
+++ b/src/pulse/stream.c
@@ -1464,13 +1464,14 @@ int pa_stream_cancel_write(
      return 0;
  }

-int pa_stream_write(
+int pa_stream_write_ext_free(
          pa_stream *s,
          const void *data,
          size_t length,
          pa_free_cb_t free_cb,
          int64_t offset,
-        pa_seek_mode_t seek) {
+        pa_seek_mode_t seek,
+        const void *free_cb_data) {

I think it would be wise to switch order here, i e, to have the free_cb just before free_cb_data.

Also, because "userdata" usually is "void *" (not "const void *"), maybe it would make more sense to have free_cb_data as "void *" too?


      pa_assert(s);
      pa_assert(PA_REFCNT_VALUE(s) >= 1);
@@ -1519,7 +1520,7 @@ int pa_stream_write(
              chunk.index = 0;

              if (free_cb && !pa_pstream_get_shm(s->context->pstream)) {
-                chunk.memblock = pa_memblock_new_user(s->context->mempool, 
(void*) t_data, t_length, free_cb, 1);
+                chunk.memblock = pa_memblock_new_user(s->context->mempool, 
(void*) t_data, t_length, free_cb, 1, (void*) free_cb_data);
                  chunk.length = t_length;
              } else {
                  void *d;
@@ -1544,7 +1545,7 @@ int pa_stream_write(
          }

          if (free_cb && pa_pstream_get_shm(s->context->pstream))
-            free_cb((void*) data);
+            free_cb((void*) free_cb_data);
      }

      /* This is obviously wrong since we ignore the seeking index . But
@@ -1591,6 +1592,17 @@ int pa_stream_write(
      return 0;
  }

+int pa_stream_write(
+        pa_stream *s,
+        const void *data,
+        size_t length,
+        pa_free_cb_t free_cb,
+        int64_t offset,
+        pa_seek_mode_t seek) {
+
+    return pa_stream_write_ext_free(s, data, length, free_cb, offset, seek, 
data);
+}
+
  int pa_stream_peek(pa_stream *s, const void **data, size_t *length) {
      pa_assert(s);
      pa_assert(PA_REFCNT_VALUE(s) >= 1);
diff --git a/src/pulse/stream.h b/src/pulse/stream.h
index 7ceb569..6fbd663 100644
--- a/src/pulse/stream.h
+++ b/src/pulse/stream.h
@@ -554,6 +554,17 @@ int pa_stream_write(
          int64_t offset,          /**< Offset for seeking, must be 0 for 
upload streams */
          pa_seek_mode_t seek      /**< Seek mode, must be PA_SEEK_RELATIVE for 
upload streams */);

+/** Function does exactly the same as pa_stream_write() with the difference
+ *  that free_cb_data is passed to free_cb instead of data. \since 6.0 */
+int pa_stream_write_ext_free(
+        pa_stream *p             /**< The stream to use */,
+        const void *data         /**< The data to write */,
+        size_t nbytes            /**< The length of the data to write in bytes 
*/,
+        pa_free_cb_t free_cb     /**< A cleanup routine for the data or NULL 
to request an internal copy */,
+        int64_t offset,          /**< Offset for seeking, must be 0 for upload 
streams */

Nitpick: Inconsistent comma placement. I saw it was there in pa_stream_write too, but let's fix it anyway :-)

+        pa_seek_mode_t seek      /**< Seek mode, must be PA_SEEK_RELATIVE for 
upload streams */,
+        const void *free_cb_data /**< Argument passed to free_cb function */);
+
  /** Read the next fragment from the buffer (for recording streams).
   * If there is data at the current read index, \a data will point to
   * the actual data and \a nbytes will contain the size of the data in
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/memblock.c b/src/pulsecore/memblock.c
index 9cc02c1..3d75d99 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/memblock.c
+++ b/src/pulsecore/memblock.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct pa_memblock {
          struct {
              /* If type == PA_MEMBLOCK_USER this points to a function for 
freeing this memory block */
              pa_free_cb_t free_cb;
+            /* If type == PA_MEMBLOCK_USER this is passed as free_cb argument 
*/
+            pa_atomic_ptr_t free_cb_data;

Hmm, I'm not sure why free_cb_data needs to be atomic. If it's only set once in the creation of the memblock, then why not keep it as "void *" consistently?

          } user;

          struct {
@@ -387,7 +389,13 @@ pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_fixed(pa_mempool *p, void *d, 
size_t length, bool r
  }

  /* No lock necessary */
-pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_user(pa_mempool *p, void *d, size_t length, 
pa_free_cb_t free_cb, bool read_only) {
+pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_user(
+        pa_mempool *p,
+        void *d,
+        size_t length,
+        pa_free_cb_t free_cb,
+        bool read_only,

Same as previous comment; keep free_cb next to free_cb_data

+        void *free_cb_data) {
      pa_memblock *b;

      pa_assert(p);
@@ -410,6 +418,7 @@ pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_user(pa_mempool *p, void *d, 
size_t length, pa_free
      pa_atomic_store(&b->please_signal, 0);

      b->per_type.user.free_cb = free_cb;
+    pa_atomic_ptr_store(&b->per_type.user.free_cb_data, free_cb_data);

      stat_add(b);
      return b;
@@ -513,7 +522,7 @@ static void memblock_free(pa_memblock *b) {
      switch (b->type) {
          case PA_MEMBLOCK_USER :
              pa_assert(b->per_type.user.free_cb);
-            b->per_type.user.free_cb(pa_atomic_ptr_load(&b->data));
+            
b->per_type.user.free_cb(pa_atomic_ptr_load(&b->per_type.user.free_cb_data));

              /* Fall through */

@@ -647,6 +656,7 @@ static void memblock_make_local(pa_memblock *b) {
      /* Humm, not enough space in the pool, so lets allocate the memory with 
malloc() */
      b->per_type.user.free_cb = pa_xfree;
      pa_atomic_ptr_store(&b->data, pa_xmemdup(pa_atomic_ptr_load(&b->data), 
b->length));
+    pa_atomic_ptr_store(&b->per_type.user.free_cb_data, 
pa_atomic_ptr_load(&b->data));

      b->type = PA_MEMBLOCK_USER;
      b->read_only = false;
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/memblock.h b/src/pulsecore/memblock.h
index 502f207..0bfdc92 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/memblock.h
+++ b/src/pulsecore/memblock.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new(pa_mempool *, size_t length);
  pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_pool(pa_mempool *, size_t length);

  /* Allocate a new memory block of type PA_MEMBLOCK_USER */
-pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_user(pa_mempool *, void *data, size_t length, 
pa_free_cb_t free_cb, bool read_only);
+pa_memblock *pa_memblock_new_user(pa_mempool *, void *data, size_t length, 
pa_free_cb_t free_cb, bool read_only, void *free_cb_data);

  /* A special case of pa_memblock_new_user: take a memory buffer previously 
allocated with pa_xmalloc()  */
  #define pa_memblock_new_malloced(p,data,length) pa_memblock_new_user(p, data, 
length, pa_xfree, 0)

--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to