On 2014-09-21 08:08, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 14:34 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
Cool, I did not know this was possible. So how does valgrind know that
it should pick this file up and use it? Does it also work with
out-of-tree builds?
Valgrind picks up the file when you give the option
--suppressions=<file>. I don't see why this wouldn't work in out-of-tree
builds, since the matching is (in this case) made only based on the
function name where the error happens.
Right.
Could there be a comment in the file as well what it
is about and how to use it?
Probably. I didn't notice any information about comments when I read the
syntax documentation, but I didn't particularly look for that either.
I'll add a comment in v2 if I figure out how to do that.
Looking at /usr/lib/valgrind/default.supp, it seems like # indicates a
comment line.
(Or maybe we could even get some valgrind developer to fix the root
cause, that would be even better...maybe we can grab someone in
Düsseldorf, if they're present?)
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
