On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Evan Nemerson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 22:45 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Evan Nemerson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > That's not quite right; the VAPI shouldn't indicate that a *type* >> > is >> > "unmanaged"… it's up to your code to indicate whether an instance >> > is >> > unowned. However, the question is really what the proper way to >> > destroy an instance is. >> > >> > In order to determine how to destroy a struct which doesn't specify >> > a >> > destroy_function CCode attribute, Vala will look at the >> > members. If >> > none of the members require destroy or free functions, then Vala >> > can >> > assume that simply releasing the memory associated with the struct >> > itself (i.e., calling g_free on heap-allocated instances, or simply >> > allowing stack-allocated instances to go out of scope) is >> > sufficient. >> >> Hum. Sourceinfo (and SinkInfo) should not be freed at all, the C APIs >> that retrieve them give you const pointers. > > Then they should return an unowned reference.
Is it possible to do this when the pointer is an argument? These types are requested and then asynchronously retrieved via callbacks. _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
