From: Arun Raghavan <[email protected]>
There doesn't appear to be a good reason to restrict the memchunk length
to the resample max block size -- we're going to have the memory around
anyway. Moreover, callers of pa_sink_input_get_silence() don't seem to
actually care about the chunk itself, just the memblock for creating
their own pa_memblockq.
---
src/pulsecore/sink-input.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c b/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c
index 539ae17..57e8877 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c
+++ b/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c
@@ -2104,14 +2104,12 @@ pa_memchunk* pa_sink_input_get_silence(pa_sink_input
*i, pa_memchunk *ret) {
pa_assert_ctl_context();
pa_assert(ret);
- /* FIXME: Shouldn't access resampler object from main context! */
-
pa_silence_memchunk_get(
&i->core->silence_cache,
i->core->mempool,
ret,
&i->sample_spec,
- i->thread_info.resampler ?
pa_resampler_max_block_size(i->thread_info.resampler) : 0);
+ 0);
return ret;
}
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
