On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 10:43 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 15:40 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 13:43 +0530, [email protected] wrote: > > > @@ -520,6 +525,9 @@ static pa_hook_result_t > > > sink_input_move_finish_cb(pa_core *core, pa_sink_input * > > > if (pa_proplist_gets(i->proplist, PA_PROP_FILTER_APPLY_MOVING)) > > > return PA_HOOK_OK; > > > > > > + /* If we're managing m-d-m.ignore on this, remove and re-add if > > > we're continuing to manage it */ > > > > This comment gets out of date after you rename the property in the next > > patch. (Same for the source output code.) > > Out-of-date in what sense? We do want to continue the same behaviour of > only managing the property on the stream if we actually loaded a filter > for it.
In the sense that the comment mentions "m-d-m.ignore", while the actual property name is "m-d-m.auto_filtered". -- Tanu _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
