On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Luke Yelavich <luke.yelav...@canonical.com > wrote:
> We would have to get libsoxr into Ubuntu's main repository, which requires > commitment from Canonical to keep the package up to date, keep an eye on > bugs, etc. Given that pulse has to be built against libsoxr and must be > available at runtime, and given we already use speex and are happy with the > default of speex-float-1, the extra effort of supporting another resampler > when its not our default is probably not worth it. > Ok, makes sense. But for me, it IS in Ubuntu (though universe, not main?): $ aptitude show libsoxr0 Package: libsoxr0 State: installed Automatically installed: no Multi-Arch: same Version: 0.1.2-1 Priority: optional Section: universe/libs Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> Architecture: amd64 Uncompressed Size: 215 k Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libgomp1 (>= 4.9) Breaks: libsoxr0:i386 (!= 0.1.2-1) Replaces: libsoxr0:i386 (< 0.1.2-1) Description: High quality 1D sample-rate conversion library I'm interested in quality more than speed, so speex-float-1 (as worst in the list) doesn't seem what I'm looking for. Does speex-float-10 compare favorably to the soxr methods? Do we know if the PPA* (which I did use for 7) has better methods? Looks like you may have made those, Luke :-) (Thanks!) * https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev/+archive/ubuntu/pulse-testing/+packages
_______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
