Hi,

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>>
>> Since there is no longer support for BlueZ 4 it makes no sense to keep
>> BlueZ 5 modules separated.
>>
>
> AFAICT, this would render invalid many configuration files as they would
> refer to module-bluez5-*. Is this desirable?

You mean there are some configuration that still needs changing or you
are referring to the fact that default.pa should be updated? I suppose
the latter happens all the time when there is a new module, but
perhaps we want some alias so distros don't have the trouble of
changing bluez to bluetooth.


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to