-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Luke Kanies wrote:
| Anyone opposed to trying this out?
|
| For most people, I expect the only real differences would be that you
| would never publish your own 0.24.x branch except as a duplicate of
| James's, and you would periodically need to rebase your topic branch
| against whatever you originally branched.

This is my preference - the less work for me the better. :)

Regards

James Turnbull

- --
James Turnbull ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Author of:
* Pulling Strings with Puppet
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/)
* Pro Nagios 2.0
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/)
* Hardening Linux
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIM4A69hTGvAxC30ARAn6CAKCTpoPzFoyGyB4BByUFu6X/wOcSlQCeIbyn
kPscQSJswu5e+dNVMiuETws=
=uh6B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to