Luke Kanies schrieb:
>>> I assume these overrides follow the same rules as current overrides
>>> --
>>> only possible within a subclass?
>> Maybe I'm plain wrong, but I don't think this restriction is
>> necessary,
>> since after all if the original resource is not collected/realized it
>> doesn't even exist. So the override is just that we are
>> "instantiating"
>> a different resource than what was exported/virtualized.
>
> Note that multiple classes can realize a given resource. Thus, it
> does matter, or at least, can.
I think the following two snippets should be managed by the same rules
-- the same code if at all possible:
== first piece =========================================
node other_node {
@user {
"brice":
uid => 1000,...
}
}
class with_uid {
User <| name == brice |> {
uid => 2000
}
}
class with_groups {
User <| name == brice |> {
groups => [ admin, wheel, root, sudoers ]
}
}
node this_node {
include with_uid
include with_groups
}
== second piece =========================================
class other_class {
user {
"brice":
uid => 1000,...
}
}
class with_uid inherits other_class {
User[brice] {
uid => 2000
}
}
class with_groups inherits other_class {
User[brice] {
groups => [ admin, wheel, root, sudoers ]
}
}
node this_node {
include with_uid
include with_groups
}
============
Regards, DavidS
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
