On Oct 15, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Paul Nasrat wrote: > >> That would definitely be a good thing. Facter also doesn't use facts >> with same number of confines in a predictable order (#1291) > > Ouch. > >> For domain name resolution in particular, I see no reason to have all >> these independent resolutions with no confines, since we do want >> them to >> be executed in a fixed order. I provide a patch in #1654 that >> merges all >> these resolutions into one. > > > I probably should start going through the facter bugs for the next > release, and looking at the work for dynamic facts and getting a straw > man to list so we can to discuss design.
That would be great. -- If two men agree on everything, you may be sure that one of them is doing the thinking. -- Lyndon B. Johnson --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
