On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:04 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:46 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it currently has no way to specifically force a higher
>> priority on a resolution mechanism -- this would be a good thing to
>> file as a feature request.
>
> That would definitely be a good thing. Facter also doesn't use facts
> with same number of confines in a predictable order (#1291)
>
> For domain name resolution in particular, I see no reason to have all
> these independent resolutions with no confines, since we do want
> them to
> be executed in a fixed order. I provide a patch in #1654 that merges
> all
> these resolutions into one.
I'm sure everyone wants them executed in a specific order, I'm just
not sure everyone wants them in the same order.
Either way, I've applied the patch for now, and we'll see how things
progress.
--
Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
-- H. L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
