On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Lorenz Schori wrote: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:45:02 -0600 > Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote: >> >>>> It's almost like a container relationship -- the container must be >>>> created before its contained resources, and the contained resources >>>> must be deleted before their container. Maybe 'contains' and >>>> 'containedby'? >>> >>> I vote for 'contains' and 'container', myself. >> >> >> Seem like good choices. > > Well, i probably played too much with my lego-bricks when i was a > child, so above and below sounds very natural to me. Did you guys had > babooshka puppets?
I think I know what you mean, but it just seems like a more natural relationship. I see now what you mean about above/below being reasonable terms; you have to add the bottom lego then the above lego, and vice versa for deletion. I have to say, though, legos weren't exactly my first thought for the terms. :) Is there another kind of relationship that naturally implies this LIFO sorting? -- I have an answering machine in my car. It says, "I'm home now. But leave a message and I'll call when I'm out. -- Stephen Wright --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
