On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Ohad Levy <ohadl...@gmail.com> wrote: > O >> >> Something we've been meaning to have a look at is more related to how >> Puppet works with Facter than standalone facter I guess. >> >> A broken fact shouldn't break a Puppet run at all, and it is possible >> to do this at the moment. > > > I would agree with Nigel, I think he is referring to something like: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/1527
That's the one. The only time we've had to manually sort things out on puppet clients has been when we've accidentally pushed a broken fact to clients. This is made somewhat worse by it being difficult to have facts part of the environment. We've set up a 'facts' module in each environment that is where clients get their facts from, but on first run you end up with a chicken or the egg problem where the server doesn't know what environment the client has, and even if you supply the environment on the command line, it's still ignored as far as the initial factsync goes. -- Nigel Kersten Systems Administrator Tech Lead - MacOps --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
