On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Luke Kanies <l...@madstop.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> >>> >>> This is made somewhat worse by it being difficult to have facts part >>> of the environment. We've set up a 'facts' module in each >>> environment >>> that is where clients get their facts from, but on first run you end >>> up with a chicken or the egg problem where the server doesn't know >>> what environment the client has, and even if you supply the >>> environment on the command line, it's still ignored as far as the >>> initial factsync goes. >> >> >> Really? Is that filed? It's certainly a bug, if so. I know the >> environment stuff isn't as thorough as it needs to be; it's obviously >> caught me a bit by surprise at how hard it is to get every little >> piece. > > I'll file it this week. We were attempting to work around it > differently, but it hasn't worked out as well as we hoped. > > Which behavior do you consider to be the bug? The fact that the server > doesn't take the environment into account until after the factsync > process?
Yep. -- Brand's Asymmetry: The past can only be known, not changed. The future can only be changed, not known. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---