On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:

>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Luke Kanies <l...@madstop.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is made somewhat worse by it being difficult to have facts part
>>> of the environment.  We've set up a 'facts' module in each  
>>> environment
>>> that is where clients get their facts from, but on first run you end
>>> up with a chicken or the egg problem where the server doesn't know
>>> what environment the client has, and even if you supply the
>>> environment on the command line, it's still ignored as far as the
>>> initial factsync goes.
>>
>>
>> Really?  Is that filed?  It's certainly a bug, if so.  I know the
>> environment stuff isn't as thorough as it needs to be; it's obviously
>> caught me a bit by surprise at how hard it is to get every little  
>> piece.
>
> I'll file it this week. We were attempting to work around it
> differently, but it hasn't worked out as well as we hoped.
>
> Which behavior do you consider to be the bug? The fact that the server
> doesn't take the environment into account until after the factsync
> process?


Yep.

-- 
Brand's Asymmetry:
     The past can only be known, not changed. The future can only be
     changed, not known.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to