-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all
What's everyone's thoughts/feelings/etc on ticket bounties? I've been thinking about the many issues assigned to community currently and wondering if a bounty system might not help here (mightn't either I'll admit). It'd work something like: 1. Poster assigns value to ticket 2. Dev takes ticket, writes code, submits through standard QA 3. When code is QA'ed and +1 then bounty is due 4. Bounty paid - code merged. 5. Bounty not paid - code not merged - original poster black-banned (ideas around this? Thoughts?) Feedback? Cheers James Turnbull - -- Author of: * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) * Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJqI309hTGvAxC30ARAkOzAJ9d0paxjsF8n5P8kMXqaUfVvC6ahgCgo/xH SNvX6IOXYfr1e5HuXvlIFqA= =hIX/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
