Luke Kanies wrote: > On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Paul Nasrat wrote: > >> 2009/3/20 Luke Kanies <[email protected]>: >>> Things are actually in a broken state here because we've >>> got a conflict between how the two sides do their work >>> and some extraction needs to get done. This commit >>> is just a stopping-point so I can do the necessary >>> refactoring. >> Whilst it's good to capture history it might make code review easier >> if things like this get folded/collapsed into the fixing commit. > > Yeah, this was a mistake - I was pretty sure I'd had a commit like this, > but I looked through the commit titles in rebase -i and couldn't spot > it, > so I assumed I was wrong. I obviously should have looked more deeply. > > It's apparently already been merged, so now it's too late to fix. >
Did you not want it merged? One shouldn't mark it "Ready for Checkin" then. :) James -- Author of: * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) * Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
