On Jul 3, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Brice Figureau wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 09:49 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: >> On Jul 3, 2009, at 2:12 AM, Brice Figureau wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:16 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: >>>> On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Peter Meier wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>>> I am starting work on a set of cobbler types for puppet and had a >>>>>> few >>>>>> questions, >>>>> >>>>> cool, hope you'll release them?! >>>>> >>>>>> When I declare a new system in cobbler I can define multiple >>>>>> nics, >>>>>> each nic can have many parameters, is there a clean way of doing >>>>>> this >>>>>> in puppet, ie. if1 => eth0, mac1 => ..., if2 => eth2, mac2 => ... >>>>>> or should I just make another type called cobbler_nic which take >>>>>> the >>>>>> host system as a param and attaches it that way? >>>>> >>>>> hmm first I thought that maybe a parameter with an array could >>>>> be a >>>>> solution. unfortunately this wouldn't be yet that easy handable. >>>>> Maybe a >>>>> seperate type (which would autorequire the system type) would be >>>>> fine. >>>> >>>> I think a separate type would be best. I'd really like >>>> namespaces in >>>> native types. :/ >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Or we would finally adapt hashmaps to be supported by the DSL, >>>>> which >>>>> would then make then parameter solution really easy. (There have >>>>> been >>>>> recently a discussion about that, see thread >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/fykm3nj2eqqt7gfx) >>>> >>>> >>>> You depend on that for your work, you're going to be waiting a >>>> while, >>>> I think, unless Bryce finds himself just amazingly bored. :) >>> >>> That's on my TODO list (Peter can you file a ticket for this >>> feature?), >>> but IMHO we should focus on 0.25.0, so up to now I preferred >>> spending my >>> time on 0.25 bugs (OK, I spent some time on #2033 too). >> >> My preference is definitely that development focus on 0.25 until we >> get it out the door, so I appreciate it. > > Yes, it was my understanding that #2033 was a feature for 0.26 (I > don't > feel it would be right to add new feature while we're in beta). > It just happened that I was cut off from the Internet a couple of > weeks > ago, so that was the perfect time to work on a bigger thing not > involving redmine :-)
Makes sense. I may end up getting more features in 0.25, also, if clients change my priorities, which looks like it's possible. -- Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. -- Arthur Schopenhauer --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
