On 5/07/09 4:39, James Turnbull wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Luke Kanies wrote: >>> Yes, it was my understanding that #2033 was a feature for 0.26 (I >>> don't >>> feel it would be right to add new feature while we're in beta). >>> It just happened that I was cut off from the Internet a couple of >>> weeks >>> ago, so that was the perfect time to work on a bigger thing not >>> involving redmine :-) >> Makes sense. >> >> I may end up getting more features in 0.25, also, if clients change my >> priorities, which looks like it's possible. >> > > At some point we need to call "enough". We're up to b2. I don't > want to end up like Dovecot with b15. I think one (or at the most > two more) betas would be a reasonable limit.
Yes, I completely agree. We should focus on getting to 0 high/important bugs. What we can do if we absolutely want to add new features or only track them for later is to create a 0.26 branch now and commit those there. Or do the reverse and branch 0.25 now and keep 0.26 for the development. Choose your poison of course. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
